linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.10 236/243] sched/uclamp: Ignore max aggregation if rq is idle

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210719144948.536532588@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 19 Jul 2021 16:54:25 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan@...soc.com>,
        "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
        Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@....com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 236/243] sched/uclamp: Ignore max aggregation if rq is idle

From: Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan@...soc.com>

[ Upstream commit 3e1493f46390618ea78607cb30c58fc19e2a5035 ]

When a task wakes up on an idle rq, uclamp_rq_util_with() would max
aggregate with rq value. But since there is no task enqueued yet, the
values are stale based on the last task that was running. When the new
task actually wakes up and enqueued, then the rq uclamp values should
reflect that of the newly woken up task effective uclamp values.

This is a problem particularly for uclamp_max because it default to
1024. If a task p with uclamp_max = 512 wakes up, then max aggregation
would ignore the capping that should apply when this task is enqueued,
which is wrong.

Fix that by ignoring max aggregation if the rq is idle since in that
case the effective uclamp value of the rq will be the ones of the task
that will wake up.

Fixes: 9d20ad7dfc9a ("sched/uclamp: Add uclamp_util_with()")
Signed-off-by: Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan@...soc.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
[qias: Changelog]
Reviewed-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@....com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210630141204.8197-1-xuewen.yan94@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 kernel/sched/sched.h | 21 ++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index fdebfcbdfca9..39112ac7ab34 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -2422,20 +2422,27 @@ static __always_inline
 unsigned long uclamp_rq_util_with(struct rq *rq, unsigned long util,
 				  struct task_struct *p)
 {
-	unsigned long min_util;
-	unsigned long max_util;
+	unsigned long min_util = 0;
+	unsigned long max_util = 0;
 
 	if (!static_branch_likely(&sched_uclamp_used))
 		return util;
 
-	min_util = READ_ONCE(rq->uclamp[UCLAMP_MIN].value);
-	max_util = READ_ONCE(rq->uclamp[UCLAMP_MAX].value);
-
 	if (p) {
-		min_util = max(min_util, uclamp_eff_value(p, UCLAMP_MIN));
-		max_util = max(max_util, uclamp_eff_value(p, UCLAMP_MAX));
+		min_util = uclamp_eff_value(p, UCLAMP_MIN);
+		max_util = uclamp_eff_value(p, UCLAMP_MAX);
+
+		/*
+		 * Ignore last runnable task's max clamp, as this task will
+		 * reset it. Similarly, no need to read the rq's min clamp.
+		 */
+		if (rq->uclamp_flags & UCLAMP_FLAG_IDLE)
+			goto out;
 	}
 
+	min_util = max_t(unsigned long, min_util, READ_ONCE(rq->uclamp[UCLAMP_MIN].value));
+	max_util = max_t(unsigned long, max_util, READ_ONCE(rq->uclamp[UCLAMP_MAX].value));
+out:
 	/*
 	 * Since CPU's {min,max}_util clamps are MAX aggregated considering
 	 * RUNNABLE tasks with _different_ clamps, we can end up with an
-- 
2.30.2