linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.10 182/243] NFSv4/pnfs: Fix layoutget behaviour after invalidation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210719144946.793544088@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 19 Jul 2021 16:53:31 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...merspace.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 182/243] NFSv4/pnfs: Fix layoutget behaviour after invalidation

From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...merspace.com>

[ Upstream commit 0b77f97a7e42adc72bd566ff8cb733ea426f74f6 ]

If the layout gets invalidated, we should wait for any outstanding
layoutget requests for that layout to complete, and we should resend
them only after re-establishing the layout stateid.

Fixes: d29b468da4f9 ("pNFS/NFSv4: Improve rejection of out-of-order layouts")
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...merspace.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 fs/nfs/pnfs.c | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
index c0c2612f14af..371665e0c154 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
@@ -2015,7 +2015,7 @@ lookup_again:
 	 * If the layout segment list is empty, but there are outstanding
 	 * layoutget calls, then they might be subject to a layoutrecall.
 	 */
-	if (list_empty(&lo->plh_segs) &&
+	if ((list_empty(&lo->plh_segs) || !pnfs_layout_is_valid(lo)) &&
 	    atomic_read(&lo->plh_outstanding) != 0) {
 		spin_unlock(&ino->i_lock);
 		lseg = ERR_PTR(wait_var_event_killable(&lo->plh_outstanding,
@@ -2391,11 +2391,13 @@ pnfs_layout_process(struct nfs4_layoutget *lgp)
 		goto out_forget;
 	}
 
+	if (!pnfs_layout_is_valid(lo) && !pnfs_is_first_layoutget(lo))
+		goto out_forget;
+
 	if (nfs4_stateid_match_other(&lo->plh_stateid, &res->stateid)) {
 		/* existing state ID, make sure the sequence number matches. */
 		if (pnfs_layout_stateid_blocked(lo, &res->stateid)) {
-			if (!pnfs_layout_is_valid(lo) &&
-			    pnfs_is_first_layoutget(lo))
+			if (!pnfs_layout_is_valid(lo))
 				lo->plh_barrier = 0;
 			dprintk("%s forget reply due to sequence\n", __func__);
 			goto out_forget;
@@ -2416,8 +2418,6 @@ pnfs_layout_process(struct nfs4_layoutget *lgp)
 		goto out_forget;
 	} else {
 		/* We have a completely new layout */
-		if (!pnfs_is_first_layoutget(lo))
-			goto out_forget;
 		pnfs_set_layout_stateid(lo, &res->stateid, lgp->cred, true);
 	}
 
-- 
2.30.2