[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210719144945.567722837@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 16:52:35 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Srinivas Neeli <srinivas.neeli@...inx.com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.12 093/292] gpio: zynq: Check return value of irq_get_irq_data
From: Srinivas Neeli <srinivas.neeli@...inx.com>
[ Upstream commit 35d7b72a632bc7afb15356f44005554af8697904 ]
In two different instances the return value of "irq_get_irq_data"
API was neither captured nor checked.
Fixed it by capturing the return value and then checking for any error.
Addresses-Coverity: "returned_null"
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Neeli <srinivas.neeli@...inx.com>
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
drivers/gpio/gpio-zynq.c | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-zynq.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-zynq.c
index fb8684d70fe3..c288a7502de2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-zynq.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-zynq.c
@@ -736,6 +736,11 @@ static int __maybe_unused zynq_gpio_suspend(struct device *dev)
struct zynq_gpio *gpio = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
struct irq_data *data = irq_get_irq_data(gpio->irq);
+ if (!data) {
+ dev_err(dev, "irq_get_irq_data() failed\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
if (!device_may_wakeup(dev))
disable_irq(gpio->irq);
@@ -753,6 +758,11 @@ static int __maybe_unused zynq_gpio_resume(struct device *dev)
struct irq_data *data = irq_get_irq_data(gpio->irq);
int ret;
+ if (!data) {
+ dev_err(dev, "irq_get_irq_data() failed\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
if (!device_may_wakeup(dev))
enable_irq(gpio->irq);
--
2.30.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists