linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.12 108/292] s390/mem_detect: fix diag260() program check new psw handling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210719144946.045831472@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 19 Jul 2021 16:52:50 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.12 108/292] s390/mem_detect: fix diag260() program check new psw handling

From: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>

[ Upstream commit 86807f348f418a84970eebb8f9912a7eea16b497 ]

The __diag260() inline asm temporarily changes the program check new
psw to redirect a potential program check on the diag instruction.
Restoring of the program check new psw is done in C code behind the
inline asm.

This can be problematic, especially if the function is inlined, since
the compiler can reorder instructions in such a way that a different
instruction, which may result in a program check, might be executed
before the program check new psw has been restored.

To avoid such a scenario move restoring into the inline asm. For
consistency reasons move also saving of the original program check new
psw into the inline asm.

Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 arch/s390/boot/mem_detect.c | 19 +++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/boot/mem_detect.c b/arch/s390/boot/mem_detect.c
index 40168e59abd3..3f093556dc3b 100644
--- a/arch/s390/boot/mem_detect.c
+++ b/arch/s390/boot/mem_detect.c
@@ -69,24 +69,27 @@ static int __diag260(unsigned long rx1, unsigned long rx2)
 	register unsigned long _ry asm("4") = 0x10; /* storage configuration */
 	int rc = -1;				    /* fail */
 	unsigned long reg1, reg2;
-	psw_t old = S390_lowcore.program_new_psw;
+	psw_t old;
 
 	asm volatile(
+		"	mvc	0(16,%[psw_old]),0(%[psw_pgm])\n"
 		"	epsw	%0,%1\n"
-		"	st	%0,%[psw_pgm]\n"
-		"	st	%1,%[psw_pgm]+4\n"
+		"	st	%0,0(%[psw_pgm])\n"
+		"	st	%1,4(%[psw_pgm])\n"
 		"	larl	%0,1f\n"
-		"	stg	%0,%[psw_pgm]+8\n"
+		"	stg	%0,8(%[psw_pgm])\n"
 		"	diag	%[rx],%[ry],0x260\n"
 		"	ipm	%[rc]\n"
 		"	srl	%[rc],28\n"
-		"1:\n"
+		"1:	mvc	0(16,%[psw_pgm]),0(%[psw_old])\n"
 		: "=&d" (reg1), "=&a" (reg2),
-		  [psw_pgm] "=Q" (S390_lowcore.program_new_psw),
+		  "+Q" (S390_lowcore.program_new_psw),
+		  "=Q" (old),
 		  [rc] "+&d" (rc), [ry] "+d" (_ry)
-		: [rx] "d" (_rx1), "d" (_rx2)
+		: [rx] "d" (_rx1), "d" (_rx2),
+		  [psw_old] "a" (&old),
+		  [psw_pgm] "a" (&S390_lowcore.program_new_psw)
 		: "cc", "memory");
-	S390_lowcore.program_new_psw = old;
 	return rc == 0 ? _ry : -1;
 }
 
-- 
2.30.2