linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.12 200/292] PCI: iproc: Fix multi-MSI base vector number allocation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210719144949.062894099@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 19 Jul 2021 16:54:22 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org>,
        Sandor Bodo-Merle <sbodomerle@...il.com>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Ray Jui <ray.jui@...adcom.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.12 200/292] PCI: iproc: Fix multi-MSI base vector number allocation

From: Sandor Bodo-Merle <sbodomerle@...il.com>

[ Upstream commit e673d697b9a234fc3544ac240e173cef8c82b349 ]

Commit fc54bae28818 ("PCI: iproc: Allow allocation of multiple MSIs")
introduced multi-MSI support with a broken allocation mechanism (it failed
to reserve the proper number of bits from the inner domain).  Natural
alignment of the base vector number was also not guaranteed.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210622152630.40842-1-sbodomerle@gmail.com
Fixes: fc54bae28818 ("PCI: iproc: Allow allocation of multiple MSIs")
Reported-by: Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sandor Bodo-Merle <sbodomerle@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Acked-by: Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org>
Acked-by: Ray Jui <ray.jui@...adcom.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc-msi.c | 21 +++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc-msi.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc-msi.c
index eede4e8f3f75..557d93dcb3bc 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc-msi.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc-msi.c
@@ -252,18 +252,18 @@ static int iproc_msi_irq_domain_alloc(struct irq_domain *domain,
 
 	mutex_lock(&msi->bitmap_lock);
 
-	/* Allocate 'nr_cpus' number of MSI vectors each time */
-	hwirq = bitmap_find_next_zero_area(msi->bitmap, msi->nr_msi_vecs, 0,
-					   msi->nr_cpus, 0);
-	if (hwirq < msi->nr_msi_vecs) {
-		bitmap_set(msi->bitmap, hwirq, msi->nr_cpus);
-	} else {
-		mutex_unlock(&msi->bitmap_lock);
-		return -ENOSPC;
-	}
+	/*
+	 * Allocate 'nr_irqs' multiplied by 'nr_cpus' number of MSI vectors
+	 * each time
+	 */
+	hwirq = bitmap_find_free_region(msi->bitmap, msi->nr_msi_vecs,
+					order_base_2(msi->nr_cpus * nr_irqs));
 
 	mutex_unlock(&msi->bitmap_lock);
 
+	if (hwirq < 0)
+		return -ENOSPC;
+
 	for (i = 0; i < nr_irqs; i++) {
 		irq_domain_set_info(domain, virq + i, hwirq + i,
 				    &iproc_msi_bottom_irq_chip,
@@ -284,7 +284,8 @@ static void iproc_msi_irq_domain_free(struct irq_domain *domain,
 	mutex_lock(&msi->bitmap_lock);
 
 	hwirq = hwirq_to_canonical_hwirq(msi, data->hwirq);
-	bitmap_clear(msi->bitmap, hwirq, msi->nr_cpus);
+	bitmap_release_region(msi->bitmap, hwirq,
+			      order_base_2(msi->nr_cpus * nr_irqs));
 
 	mutex_unlock(&msi->bitmap_lock);
 
-- 
2.30.2