linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] iov_iter: Introduce ITER_FLAG_FAST

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 19 Jul 2021 12:29:35 -0700
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com>
Cc:     Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        cluster-devel <cluster-devel@...hat.com>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] iov_iter: Introduce ITER_FLAG_FAST_ONLY flag

On Sun, Jul 18, 2021 at 3:40 PM Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> Introduce a new ITER_FLAG_FAST_ONLY flag

I think the code is fine, but I think it might be best to call this
"ITER_FLAG_NOIO" or something like that.

The "FAST_ONLY" name makes sense in the context of
"get_user_pages_fast()" where we have that "fast" naming (and the long
history too). But I don't think it makes much sense as a name in the
context of iov_iter.

                   Linus