[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOQ_QsjyP0PMGOorTss2Fpn011mHPwVqQ72x26Gs2L0bg2amsQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 12:37:52 -0700
From: Oliver Upton <oupton@...gle.com>
To: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>
Cc: Alexandru Elisei <Alexandru.Elisei@....com>,
salil.mehta@...wei.com, lorenzo.pieralisi@....com,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, corbet@....net, maz@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jonathan.cameron@...wei.com,
catalin.marinas@....com, pbonzini@...hat.com, will@...nel.org,
kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] KVM: arm64: Pass PSCI to userspace
On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 11:02 AM Jean-Philippe Brucker
<jean-philippe@...aro.org> wrote:
> We forward the whole PSCI function range, so it's either KVM or userspace.
> If KVM manages PSCI and the guest calls an unimplemented function, that
> returns directly to the guest without going to userspace.
>
> The concern is valid for any other range, though. If userspace enables the
> HVC cap it receives function calls that at some point KVM might need to
> handle itself. So we need some negotiation between user and KVM about the
> specific HVC ranges that userspace can and will handle.
Are we going to use KVM_CAPs for every interesting HVC range that
userspace may want to trap? I wonder if a more generic interface for
hypercall filtering would have merit to handle the aforementioned
cases, and whatever else a VMM will want to intercept down the line.
For example, x86 has the concept of 'MSR filtering', wherein userspace
can specify a set of registers that it wants to intercept. Doing
something similar for HVCs would avoid the need for a kernel change
each time a VMM wishes to intercept a new hypercall.
--
Thanks,
Oliver
Powered by blists - more mailing lists