[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <80b7d7fc-9d6d-0d1b-a333-b0ccd856e7c1@bytedance.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 20:56:01 +0800
From: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>
To: Mika Penttilä <mika.penttila@...tfour.com>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, tglx@...utronix.de, hannes@...xchg.org,
mhocko@...nel.org, vdavydov.dev@...il.com
Cc: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, songmuchun@...edance.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] mm: free user PTE page table pages
On 7/18/21 2:19 PM, Mika Penttilä wrote:
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * returns true if the pmd has been populated with PTE page table,
>> + * or false for all other cases.
>> + */
>> +bool pte_install_try_get(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd, pgtable_t
>> *pte)
>> +{
>> + spinlock_t *ptl;
>> + bool retval = true;
>> +
>> +retry:
>> + ptl = pmd_lock(mm, pmd);
>> + if (likely(pmd_none(*pmd))) {
>> + __pte_install(mm, pmd, pte);
>> + } else if (pmd_leaf(*pmd) || !pmd_present(*pmd)) {
>> + retval = false;
>> + } else if (!pte_get_unless_zero(pmd)) {
>> + spin_unlock(ptl);
>> + goto retry;
>> + }
>> + spin_unlock(ptl);
>> + return retval;
>> +}
>> +
>
> Can pte_get_unless_zero() return true above? Can the pmd have been by
> populated by others? In that case the ref count is wrongly incremented.
>
Here we only have mmap_read_lock(mm), so the pmd can be populated with
other PTE page table page after a page fault in a different thread B of
this mm. In this case, thread B already hold a pte_refcount of the PTE
page table page populated in the pmd, so pte_get_unless_zero() can
return true above.
Similarly, if THP is enabled, the pmd also can be populated with a THP
page, we can see more detail in comment in handle_pte_fault(). The
pmd_leaf() above is to detect this situation.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists