linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/7] mm: free user PTE page table pages

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 19 Jul 2021 22:12:04 +0800
From:   Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>
To:     Mika Penttilä <mika.penttila@...tfour.com>,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, tglx@...utronix.de, hannes@...xchg.org,
        mhocko@...nel.org, vdavydov.dev@...il.com
Cc:     linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, songmuchun@...edance.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] mm: free user PTE page table pages

On 7/19/21 9:55 PM, Mika Penttilä wrote:
> 
> 
> On 19.7.2021 15.56, Qi Zheng wrote:
>> On 7/18/21 2:19 PM, Mika Penttilä wrote:
>>
>>>> +
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * returns true if the pmd has been populated with PTE page table,
>>>> + * or false for all other cases.
>>>> + */
>>>> +bool pte_install_try_get(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd, 
>>>> pgtable_t *pte)
>>>> +{
>>>> +    spinlock_t *ptl;
>>>> +    bool retval = true;
>>>> +
>>>> +retry:
>>>> +    ptl = pmd_lock(mm, pmd);
>>>> +    if (likely(pmd_none(*pmd))) {
>>>> +        __pte_install(mm, pmd, pte);
>>>> +    } else if (pmd_leaf(*pmd) || !pmd_present(*pmd)) {
>>>> +        retval = false;
>>>> +    } else if (!pte_get_unless_zero(pmd)) {
>>>> +        spin_unlock(ptl);
>>>> +        goto retry;
>>>> +    }
>>>> +    spin_unlock(ptl);
>>>> +    return retval;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>
>>> Can pte_get_unless_zero() return true above? Can the pmd have been by 
>>> populated by others? In that case the ref count is wrongly incremented.
>>>
>>
>> Here we only have mmap_read_lock(mm), so the pmd can be populated with
>> other PTE page table page after a page fault in a different thread B 
>> of this mm. In this case, thread B already hold a pte_refcount of the 
>> PTE page table page populated in the pmd, so pte_get_unless_zero() can
>> return true above.
>>
> 
> Yes but if thread B populates the page table page and pte, then we also 
> increase the refcount with pte_get_unless_zero() , but dont decrease it 
> when notice !pte_none().
> And in the pte_none() case, the refcount is increased again, so double 
> accounting. see finish_fault().

The semantics of this function is to hold the pte_refcount count when it
returns 1, and its caller is responsible for decrease the pte_refcount
by calling pte_put(), like the following pattern:

	do_anonymous_page()

	--> pte_alloc_try_get()

	    do something about pte

	    pte_put()

Similarly in finish_fault().

Thanks,

Qi

> 
>> Similarly, if THP is enabled, the pmd also can be populated with a THP 
>> page, we can see more detail in comment in handle_pte_fault(). The
>> pmd_leaf() above is to detect this situation.
>