linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 8/8] firmware: tee_bnxt: Release TEE shm, session, and context during kexec

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 20 Jul 2021 11:59:00 -0700
From:   Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To:     Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@...ux.microsoft.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc:     Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org>,
        Vikas Gupta <vikas.gupta@...adcom.com>,
        Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>,
        Allen Pais <apais@...ux.microsoft.com>,
        Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>,
        Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>,
        Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
        Thirupathaiah Annapureddy <thiruan@...rosoft.com>,
        Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>,
        OP-TEE TrustedFirmware <op-tee@...ts.trustedfirmware.org>,
        linux-integrity <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>,
        BCM Kernel Feedback <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
        linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 8/8] firmware: tee_bnxt: Release TEE shm, session, and
 context during kexec

On 7/20/21 11:15 AM, Tyler Hicks wrote:
> On 2021-07-20 10:57:18, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 7/19/2021 7:32 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 7/19/2021 3:49 AM, Jens Wiklander wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 4:48 AM Vikas Gupta
>>>> <vikas.gupta@...adcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Allen/Tyler,
>>>>>   The patch looks good to me.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>>> Rafal, is it OK if I include this patch together with the rest of the
>>>> patches in this patch set in a pull request to arm-soc?
>>>
>>> I can take those patches through the Broadcom ARM SoC pull request,
>>> Rafal would that work for you? We seem to have a bit of a maintainer
>>> coverage blind spot for that directory.
>>
>> Applied to drivers/fixes: https://github.com/Broadcom/stblinux/commit/4ecd797b7e16eb7f1b86fbfd7e4a7887b192535b
> 
> Thanks, Florian, but note that you won't be able to build that branch
> since the commit uses a new function (tee_shm_alloc_kernel_buf()) that's
> added earlier in the full series. It seems like it is going to be easier
> for this to all go through Jens.

I was grepping for the new functions added and could find all
references, though it looks like I missed tee_shm_alloc_kernel_buf()
somehow, so yes, having Jens merge that series all together would make
more sense here. If you need it:

Acked-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
-- 
Florian