| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAKMK7uF1=Y6_9znGoWG8GrteXBBRmyW8C3bFE+eJQqOj0A1buA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 22:55:39 +0200
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
To: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>
Cc: Christian König <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@...il.com>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>,
"open list:DRM DRIVER FOR MSM ADRENO GPU"
<freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org>, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
"open list:DRM DRIVER FOR MSM ADRENO GPU"
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
"moderated list:DMA BUFFER SHARING FRAMEWORK"
<linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org>, Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>,
"open list:DMA BUFFER SHARING FRAMEWORK"
<linux-media@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH] drm/msm: Add fence->wait() op
On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 8:26 PM Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 11:03 AM Christian König
> <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Rob,
> >
> > Am 20.07.21 um 17:07 schrieb Rob Clark:
> > > From: Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>
> > >
> > > Somehow we had neither ->wait() nor dma_fence_signal() calls, and no
> > > one noticed. Oops.
> >
> >
> > I'm not sure if that is a good idea.
> >
> > The dma_fence->wait() callback is pretty much deprecated and should not
> > be used any more.
> >
> > What exactly do you need that for?
>
> Well, the alternative is to track the set of fences which have
> signalling enabled, and then figure out which ones to signal, which
> seems like a lot more work, vs just re-purposing the wait
> implementation we already have for non-dma_fence cases ;-)
>
> Why is the ->wait() callback (pretty much) deprecated?
Because if you need it that means for your driver dma_fence_add_cb is
broken, which means a _lot_ of things don't work. Like dma_buf poll
(compositors have patches to start using that), and I think
drm/scheduler also becomes rather unhappy.
It essentially exists only for old drivers where ->enable_signalling
is unreliable and we paper over that with a retry loop in ->wait and
pray no one notices that it's too butchered. The proper fix is to have
a driver thread to guarantee that ->enable_signalling works reliable,
so you don't need a ->wait.
Can you type up a kerneldoc patch for dma_fence_ops->wait to hammer
this in please?
-Daniel
>
> BR,
> -R
>
> > Regards,
> > Christian.
> >
> > >
> > > Note that this removes the !timeout case, which has not been used in
> > > a long time.
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_fence.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++--------------
> > > 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_fence.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_fence.c
> > > index cd59a5918038..8ee96b90ded6 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_fence.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_fence.c
> > > @@ -38,11 +38,10 @@ static inline bool fence_completed(struct msm_fence_context *fctx, uint32_t fenc
> > > return (int32_t)(fctx->completed_fence - fence) >= 0;
> > > }
> > >
> > > -/* legacy path for WAIT_FENCE ioctl: */
> > > -int msm_wait_fence(struct msm_fence_context *fctx, uint32_t fence,
> > > - ktime_t *timeout, bool interruptible)
> > > +static signed long wait_fence(struct msm_fence_context *fctx, uint32_t fence,
> > > + signed long remaining_jiffies, bool interruptible)
> > > {
> > > - int ret;
> > > + signed long ret;
> > >
> > > if (fence > fctx->last_fence) {
> > > DRM_ERROR_RATELIMITED("%s: waiting on invalid fence: %u (of %u)\n",
> > > @@ -50,33 +49,34 @@ int msm_wait_fence(struct msm_fence_context *fctx, uint32_t fence,
> > > return -EINVAL;
> > > }
> > >
> > > - if (!timeout) {
> > > - /* no-wait: */
> > > - ret = fence_completed(fctx, fence) ? 0 : -EBUSY;
> > > + if (interruptible) {
> > > + ret = wait_event_interruptible_timeout(fctx->event,
> > > + fence_completed(fctx, fence),
> > > + remaining_jiffies);
> > > } else {
> > > - unsigned long remaining_jiffies = timeout_to_jiffies(timeout);
> > > -
> > > - if (interruptible)
> > > - ret = wait_event_interruptible_timeout(fctx->event,
> > > - fence_completed(fctx, fence),
> > > - remaining_jiffies);
> > > - else
> > > - ret = wait_event_timeout(fctx->event,
> > > - fence_completed(fctx, fence),
> > > - remaining_jiffies);
> > > -
> > > - if (ret == 0) {
> > > - DBG("timeout waiting for fence: %u (completed: %u)",
> > > - fence, fctx->completed_fence);
> > > - ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
> > > - } else if (ret != -ERESTARTSYS) {
> > > - ret = 0;
> > > - }
> > > + ret = wait_event_timeout(fctx->event,
> > > + fence_completed(fctx, fence),
> > > + remaining_jiffies);
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + if (ret == 0) {
> > > + DBG("timeout waiting for fence: %u (completed: %u)",
> > > + fence, fctx->completed_fence);
> > > + ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
> > > + } else if (ret != -ERESTARTSYS) {
> > > + ret = 0;
> > > }
> > >
> > > return ret;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +/* legacy path for WAIT_FENCE ioctl: */
> > > +int msm_wait_fence(struct msm_fence_context *fctx, uint32_t fence,
> > > + ktime_t *timeout, bool interruptible)
> > > +{
> > > + return wait_fence(fctx, fence, timeout_to_jiffies(timeout), interruptible);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > /* called from workqueue */
> > > void msm_update_fence(struct msm_fence_context *fctx, uint32_t fence)
> > > {
> > > @@ -114,10 +114,19 @@ static bool msm_fence_signaled(struct dma_fence *fence)
> > > return fence_completed(f->fctx, f->base.seqno);
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static signed long msm_fence_wait(struct dma_fence *fence, bool intr,
> > > + signed long timeout)
> > > +{
> > > + struct msm_fence *f = to_msm_fence(fence);
> > > +
> > > + return wait_fence(f->fctx, fence->seqno, timeout, intr);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > static const struct dma_fence_ops msm_fence_ops = {
> > > .get_driver_name = msm_fence_get_driver_name,
> > > .get_timeline_name = msm_fence_get_timeline_name,
> > > .signaled = msm_fence_signaled,
> > > + .wait = msm_fence_wait,
> > > };
> > >
> > > struct dma_fence *
> >
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
Powered by blists - more mailing lists