[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e494866f38e9dcd2834971d3867244fb1d7e6ceb.camel@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 08:02:42 +1000
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
Cc: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Ali Saidi <alisaidi@...zon.com>,
Jon Nettleton <jon@...id-run.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] hwrng: Add Arm SMCCC TRNG based driver
On Tue, 2021-07-20 at 17:16 +0100, Andre Przywara wrote:
> Yes, a similar idea was already brought up before. I think there is even
> the potential for something like an artificial SMCCC "bus", where those
> services presentable as devices could be auto-detected (by checking
> known function IDs), the respective drivers would then probe
> automatically?
Sounds like a boot time killer... can we instead describe them in DT
and/or ACPI ?
Cheers,
Ben.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists