[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210720225608.yt6ymgw3m7ol4erq@toshiba.co.jp>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 07:56:08 +0900
From: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@...hiba.co.jp>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Krzysztof WilczyĆski <kw@...ux.com>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
Punit Agrawal <punit1.agrawal@...hiba.co.jp>,
yuji2.ishikawa@...hiba.co.jp,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] PCI: visconti: Add Toshiba Visconti PCIe host
controller driver
Hi,
Thanks for your review.
On Thu, Jul 01, 2021 at 09:43:49AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 5:50 PM Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
> <nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@...hiba.co.jp> wrote:
> >
> > Add support to PCIe RC controller on Toshiba Visconti ARM SoCs. PCIe
> > controller is based of Synopsys DesignWare PCIe core.
> >
> > This patch does not yet use the clock framework to control the clock.
> > This will be replaced in the future.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yuji Ishikawa <yuji2.ishikawa@...hiba.co.jp>
> > Signed-off-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@...hiba.co.jp>
> > ---
> > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig | 9 +
> > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile | 1 +
> > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-visconti.c | 360 +++++++++++++++++++++
> > 3 files changed, 370 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-visconti.c
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig
> > index 423d35872ce4..7c3dcb86fcad 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig
> > @@ -286,6 +286,15 @@ config PCIE_TEGRA194_EP
> > in order to enable device-specific features PCIE_TEGRA194_EP must be
> > selected. This uses the DesignWare core.
> >
> > +config PCIE_VISCONTI_HOST
> > + bool "Toshiba Visconti PCIe controllers"
> > + depends on ARCH_VISCONTI || COMPILE_TEST
> > + depends on PCI_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN
> > + select PCIE_DW_HOST
> > + help
> > + Say Y here if you want PCIe controller support on Toshiba Visconti SoC.
> > + This driver supports TMPV7708 SoC.
> > +
> > config PCIE_UNIPHIER
> > bool "Socionext UniPhier PCIe host controllers"
> > depends on ARCH_UNIPHIER || COMPILE_TEST
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile
> > index eca805c1a023..0b569d54deb3 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile
> > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_HISI_STB) += pcie-histb.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_MESON) += pci-meson.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_UNIPHIER) += pcie-uniphier.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_UNIPHIER_EP) += pcie-uniphier-ep.o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_VISCONTI_HOST) += pcie-visconti.o
> >
> > # The following drivers are for devices that use the generic ACPI
> > # pci_root.c driver but don't support standard ECAM config access.
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-visconti.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-visconti.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..1e1caa2ba1b6
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-visconti.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,360 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +/*
> > + * DWC PCIe RC driver for Toshiba Visconti ARM SoC
> > + *
> > + * Copyright (C) 2021 Toshiba Electronic Device & Storage Corporation
> > + * Copyright (C) 2021 TOSHIBA CORPORATION
> > + *
> > + * Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@...hiba.co.jp>
> > + */
> > +
> > +#include <linux/clk.h>
> > +#include <linux/delay.h>
> > +#include <linux/gpio.h>
> > +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> > +#include <linux/init.h>
> > +#include <linux/iopoll.h>
> > +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> > +#include <linux/of_platform.h>
> > +#include <linux/pci.h>
> > +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > +#include <linux/resource.h>
> > +#include <linux/types.h>
> > +
> > +#include "pcie-designware.h"
> > +#include "../../pci.h"
> > +
> > +struct visconti_pcie {
> > + struct dw_pcie pci;
> > + void __iomem *ulreg_base;
> > + void __iomem *smu_base;
> > + void __iomem *mpu_base;
> > + struct clk *refclk;
> > + struct clk *coreclk;
> > + struct clk *auxclk;
> > +};
> > +
> > +#define PCIE_UL_REG_S_PCIE_MODE 0x00F4
> > +#define PCIE_UL_REG_S_PCIE_MODE_EP 0x00
> > +#define PCIE_UL_REG_S_PCIE_MODE_RC 0x04
> > +
> > +#define PCIE_UL_REG_S_PERSTN_CTRL 0x00F8
> > +#define PCIE_UL_IOM_PCIE_PERSTN_I_EN BIT(3)
> > +#define PCIE_UL_DIRECT_PERSTN_EN BIT(2)
> > +#define PCIE_UL_PERSTN_OUT BIT(1)
> > +#define PCIE_UL_DIRECT_PERSTN BIT(0)
> > +#define PCIE_UL_REG_S_PERSTN_CTRL_INIT (PCIE_UL_IOM_PCIE_PERSTN_I_EN | \
> > + PCIE_UL_DIRECT_PERSTN_EN | \
> > + PCIE_UL_DIRECT_PERSTN)
> > +
> > +#define PCIE_UL_REG_S_PHY_INIT_02 0x0104
> > +#define PCIE_UL_PHY0_SRAM_EXT_LD_DONE BIT(0)
> > +
> > +#define PCIE_UL_REG_S_PHY_INIT_03 0x0108
> > +#define PCIE_UL_PHY0_SRAM_INIT_DONE BIT(0)
> > +
> > +#define PCIE_UL_REG_S_INT_EVENT_MASK1 0x0138
> > +#define PCIE_UL_CFG_PME_INT BIT(0)
> > +#define PCIE_UL_CFG_LINK_EQ_REQ_INT BIT(1)
> > +#define PCIE_UL_EDMA_INT0 BIT(2)
> > +#define PCIE_UL_EDMA_INT1 BIT(3)
> > +#define PCIE_UL_EDMA_INT2 BIT(4)
> > +#define PCIE_UL_EDMA_INT3 BIT(5)
> > +#define PCIE_UL_S_INT_EVENT_MASK1_ALL (PCIE_UL_CFG_PME_INT | \
> > + PCIE_UL_CFG_LINK_EQ_REQ_INT | \
> > + PCIE_UL_EDMA_INT0 | \
> > + PCIE_UL_EDMA_INT1 | \
> > + PCIE_UL_EDMA_INT2 | \
> > + PCIE_UL_EDMA_INT3)
> > +
> > +#define PCIE_UL_REG_S_SB_MON 0x0198
> > +#define PCIE_UL_REG_S_SIG_MON 0x019C
> > +#define PCIE_UL_CORE_RST_N_MON BIT(0)
> > +
> > +#define PCIE_UL_REG_V_SII_DBG_00 0x0844
> > +#define PCIE_UL_REG_V_SII_GEN_CTRL_01 0x0860
> > +#define PCIE_UL_APP_LTSSM_ENABLE BIT(0)
> > +
> > +#define PCIE_UL_REG_V_PHY_ST_00 0x0864
> > +#define PCIE_UL_SMLH_LINK_UP BIT(0)
> > +
> > +#define PCIE_UL_REG_V_PHY_ST_02 0x0868
> > +#define PCIE_UL_S_DETECT_ACT 0x01
> > +#define PCIE_UL_S_L0 0x11
> > +
> > +#define PISMU_CKON_PCIE 0x0038
> > +#define PISMU_CKON_PCIE_AUX_CLK BIT(1)
> > +#define PISMU_CKON_PCIE_MSTR_ACLK BIT(0)
> > +
> > +#define PISMU_RSOFF_PCIE 0x0538
> > +#define PISMU_RSOFF_PCIE_ULREG_RST_N BIT(1)
> > +#define PISMU_RSOFF_PCIE_PWR_UP_RST_N BIT(0)
> > +
> > +#define PCIE_MPU_REG_MP_EN 0x0
> > +#define MPU_MP_EN_DISABLE BIT(0)
> > +
> > +#define PCIE_BUS_OFFSET 0x40000000
> > +
> > +/* Access registers in PCIe ulreg */
> > +static void visconti_ulreg_writel(struct visconti_pcie *pcie, u32 val, u32 reg)
> > +{
> > + writel_relaxed(val, pcie->ulreg_base + reg);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static u32 visconti_ulreg_readl(struct visconti_pcie *pcie, u32 reg)
> > +{
> > + return readl_relaxed(pcie->ulreg_base + reg);
> > +}
> > +
> > +/* Access registers in PCIe smu */
> > +static void visconti_smu_writel(struct visconti_pcie *pcie, u32 val, u32 reg)
> > +{
> > + writel_relaxed(val, pcie->smu_base + reg);
> > +}
> > +
> > +/* Access registers in PCIe mpu */
> > +static void visconti_mpu_writel(struct visconti_pcie *pcie, u32 val, u32 reg)
> > +{
> > + writel_relaxed(val, pcie->mpu_base + reg);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static u32 visconti_mpu_readl(struct visconti_pcie *pcie, u32 reg)
> > +{
> > + return readl_relaxed(pcie->mpu_base + reg);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int visconti_pcie_link_up(struct dw_pcie *pci)
> > +{
> > + struct visconti_pcie *pcie = dev_get_drvdata(pci->dev);
> > + void __iomem *addr = pcie->ulreg_base;
> > + int ret;
> > + u32 val;
> > +
> > + /* wait for linkup of phy link layer */
> > + ret = readl_relaxed_poll_timeout(addr + PCIE_UL_REG_V_PHY_ST_00,
> > + val, (val & PCIE_UL_SMLH_LINK_UP),
> > + 90000, 100000);
>
> This function is really supposed to be 'is the link up or not', not
> 'wait for link up' as that is what the caller does. Isn't link up just
> all 3 register bits are set? And it is possible for the 3rd bit
> (PCIE_UL_S_L0) to be set without the first 2 bits set? IOW, can't you
> just check PCIE_UL_S_L0?
I mistook in using this function.
As you wrote, there is no problem in checking PCIE_UL_S_L0. I will fix it.
>
> > + if (ret)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + /* wait for linkup of data link layer */
> > + ret = readl_relaxed_poll_timeout(addr + PCIE_UL_REG_V_PHY_ST_02,
> > + val, (val & PCIE_UL_S_DETECT_ACT),
> > + 90000, 100000);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + /* wait for LTSSM Status */
> > + ret = readl_relaxed_poll_timeout(addr + PCIE_UL_REG_V_PHY_ST_02,
> > + val, (val & PCIE_UL_S_L0),
> > + 90000, 100000);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return 0;
> > + return 1;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int visconti_pcie_start_link(struct dw_pcie *pci)
> > +{
> > + struct visconti_pcie *pcie = dev_get_drvdata(pci->dev);
> > +
> > + visconti_ulreg_writel(pcie, PCIE_UL_APP_LTSSM_ENABLE,
> > + PCIE_UL_REG_V_SII_GEN_CTRL_01);
> > +
> > + if (dw_pcie_link_up(pci)) {
> > + u32 val;
> > +
> > + val = visconti_mpu_readl(pcie, PCIE_MPU_REG_MP_EN);
> > + visconti_mpu_writel(pcie, val & ~MPU_MP_EN_DISABLE,
> > + PCIE_MPU_REG_MP_EN);
> > + visconti_ulreg_writel(pcie, PCIE_UL_S_INT_EVENT_MASK1_ALL,
> > + PCIE_UL_REG_S_INT_EVENT_MASK1);
>
> Do these really have to be set after link up?
Indeed, I can move this before dw_pcie_link_up().
I will fix this.
>
> > + }
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void visconti_pcie_stop_link(struct dw_pcie *pci)
> > +{
> > + struct visconti_pcie *pcie = dev_get_drvdata(pci->dev);
> > + u32 val;
> > +
> > + val = visconti_ulreg_readl(pcie, PCIE_UL_REG_V_SII_GEN_CTRL_01);
> > + val &= ~PCIE_UL_APP_LTSSM_ENABLE;
> > + visconti_ulreg_writel(pcie, val, PCIE_UL_REG_V_SII_GEN_CTRL_01);
> > +
> > + val = visconti_mpu_readl(pcie, PCIE_MPU_REG_MP_EN);
> > + visconti_mpu_writel(pcie, val | MPU_MP_EN_DISABLE, PCIE_MPU_REG_MP_EN);
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * In this SoC specification, the CPU bus outputs the offset value from
> > + * 0x40000000 to the PCIE bus, so 0x40000000 is subtracted from the CPU
> > + * bus address. This 0x40000000 is also based on io_base from DT.
> > + */
> > +static u64 visconti_pcie_cpu_addr_fixup(struct dw_pcie *pci, u64 cpu_addr)
> > +{
> > + struct pcie_port *pp = &pci->pp;
> > +
> > + return cpu_addr & ~pp->io_base;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const struct dw_pcie_ops dw_pcie_ops = {
> > + .cpu_addr_fixup = visconti_pcie_cpu_addr_fixup,
> > + .link_up = visconti_pcie_link_up,
> > + .start_link = visconti_pcie_start_link,
> > + .stop_link = visconti_pcie_stop_link,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int visconti_pcie_power_on(struct visconti_pcie *pcie)
> > +{
> > + void __iomem *addr;
> > + int err;
> > + u32 val;
> > +
> > + visconti_smu_writel(pcie,
> > + PISMU_CKON_PCIE_AUX_CLK | PISMU_CKON_PCIE_MSTR_ACLK,
> > + PISMU_CKON_PCIE);
> > + ndelay(250);
> > +
> > + visconti_smu_writel(pcie, PISMU_RSOFF_PCIE_ULREG_RST_N,
> > + PISMU_RSOFF_PCIE);
> > + visconti_ulreg_writel(pcie, PCIE_UL_REG_S_PCIE_MODE_RC,
> > + PCIE_UL_REG_S_PCIE_MODE);
> > +
> > + val = PCIE_UL_REG_S_PERSTN_CTRL_INIT;
> > + visconti_ulreg_writel(pcie, val, PCIE_UL_REG_S_PERSTN_CTRL);
> > + udelay(100);
> > +
> > + val |= PCIE_UL_PERSTN_OUT;
> > + visconti_ulreg_writel(pcie, val, PCIE_UL_REG_S_PERSTN_CTRL);
> > + udelay(100);
> > +
> > + visconti_smu_writel(pcie, PISMU_RSOFF_PCIE_PWR_UP_RST_N,
> > + PISMU_RSOFF_PCIE);
> > +
> > + addr = pcie->ulreg_base + PCIE_UL_REG_S_PHY_INIT_03;
> > + err = readl_relaxed_poll_timeout(addr, val,
> > + (val & PCIE_UL_PHY0_SRAM_INIT_DONE),
> > + 100, 1000);
> > + if (err)
> > + return err;
> > +
> > + visconti_ulreg_writel(pcie, PCIE_UL_PHY0_SRAM_EXT_LD_DONE,
> > + PCIE_UL_REG_S_PHY_INIT_02);
> > +
> > + addr = pcie->ulreg_base + PCIE_UL_REG_S_SIG_MON;
> > + return readl_relaxed_poll_timeout(addr, val,
> > + (val & PCIE_UL_CORE_RST_N_MON), 100,
> > + 1000);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int visconti_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
> > +{
> > + struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_pp(pp);
> > + struct visconti_pcie *pcie = dev_get_drvdata(pci->dev);
> > +
> > + return visconti_pcie_power_on(pcie);
>
> This function doesn't do anything but call visconti_pcie_power_on().
> Just collapse to 1 function.
>
OK, I will move the contents of visconti_pcie_power_on to
visconti_pcie_host_init.
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const struct dw_pcie_host_ops visconti_pcie_host_ops = {
> > + .host_init = visconti_pcie_host_init,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int visconti_get_resources(struct platform_device *pdev,
> > + struct visconti_pcie *pcie)
> > +{
> > + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > +
> > + pcie->ulreg_base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "ulreg");
> > + if (IS_ERR(pcie->ulreg_base))
> > + return PTR_ERR(pcie->ulreg_base);
> > +
> > + pcie->smu_base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "smu");
> > + if (IS_ERR(pcie->smu_base))
> > + return PTR_ERR(pcie->smu_base);
> > +
> > + pcie->mpu_base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "mpu");
> > + if (IS_ERR(pcie->mpu_base))
> > + return PTR_ERR(pcie->mpu_base);
> > +
> > + pcie->refclk = devm_clk_get(dev, "ref");
> > + if (IS_ERR(pcie->refclk))
> > + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(pcie->refclk),
> > + "Failed to get ref clock\n");
> > +
> > + pcie->coreclk = devm_clk_get(dev, "core");
> > + if (IS_ERR(pcie->coreclk))
> > + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(pcie->coreclk),
> > + "Failed to get core clock\n");
> > +
> > + pcie->auxclk = devm_clk_get(dev, "aux");
> > + if (IS_ERR(pcie->auxclk))
> > + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(pcie->auxclk),
> > + "Failed to get aux clock\n");
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int
> > +visconti_add_pcie_port(struct visconti_pcie *pcie, struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > + struct dw_pcie *pci = &pcie->pci;
> > + struct pcie_port *pp = &pci->pp;
> > + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > +
> > + pp->irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "intr");
> > + if (pp->irq < 0) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "Interrupt intr is missing");
> > + return pp->irq;
> > + }
> > +
> > + pp->ops = &visconti_pcie_host_ops;
> > +
> > + pci->link_gen = of_pci_get_max_link_speed(pdev->dev.of_node);
>
> The common DWC code reads this for you now. You only need to set it to
> default. See other drivers for examples.
I don't need this code by using DT. Remove these codes.
Best regards,
Nobuhiro
Powered by blists - more mailing lists