[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1d8c1b0f-3102-5a4a-f3fb-a0fc50d281cc@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 09:29:43 +1000
From: Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com>
To: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, catalin.marinas@....com,
will@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, chuhu@...hat.com,
shan.gavin@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/12] mm/debug_vm_pgtable: Introduce struct
pgtable_debug_args
On 7/20/21 4:42 PM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> On 7/19/21 6:31 PM, Gavin Shan wrote:
>>> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE) &&
>>> + has_transparent_hugepage()) {
>>> + page = alloc_pages(GFP_KERNEL, HPAGE_PMD_ORDER);
>>> + if (page) {
>>> + args->pmd_pfn = page_to_pfn(page);
>>> + args->pte_pfn = args->pmd_pfn;
>>> + return 0;
>>> + }
>>> + }
>>> +
>>
>> As syzbot reported against v1 series, we could allocate pages larger than (1 << (MAX_ORDER - 1)) here.
>> So __GFP_NOWARN is needed here. I will fix it in v3 series.
>
> I could find the following build error reported from lkp on V2.
>
> mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c:445:8: warning: variable 'pud' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
>
Yes, The following line is missed in PATCH[v2 09/12] and fixed in
PATCH[v3 09/12]: WARN_ON(!pud_none(pud)). With this line added,
the variable @pud is used in v3.
> Could you please point to the syzbot reported problem on V1 as you
> have mentioned above. Are there configs where HPAGE_[PMD|PUD]_ORDER
> is greater than (MAX_ORDER - 1) ? If yes, how adding __GFP_NOWARN
> solves the problem ?
>
https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=8730ec44a441a434a2c8
https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=29a82c885e192046
The kernel config has the following options:
CONFIG_X86_64=y
CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE=y
CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE_PUD=y
#define PUD_SHIFT 30
#define PMD_SHIFT 21
CONFIG_FORCE_MAX_ZONEORDER=n
#define MAX_ORDER 11
(HPAGE_PUD_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) >= (1 << MAX_ORDER)
(HPAGE_PMD_ORDER) < (1 << MAX_ORDER)
The warning is triggered in the following path, __GFP_NOWARN helps to
avoid the WARNING_ON_ONCE(), but NULL is returned as expected.
alloc_pages
__alloc_pages
if (unlikely(order >= MAX_ORDER)) {
WARN_ON_ONCE(!(gfp & __GFP_NOWARN));
return NULL;
}
Thanks,
Gavin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists