linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.13 024/800] usb: renesas-xhci: Fix handling of unknown ROM state

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAFxkdAqd69oXdhUBEmMRvmfuk2YpWS7qsDKLjUEAEg8rhQkTyQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 19 Jul 2021 21:57:00 -0500
From:   Justin Forbes <jmforbes@...uxtx.org>
To:     Moritz Fischer <mdf@...nel.org>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...el.com>,
        Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.13 024/800] usb: renesas-xhci: Fix handling of unknown
 ROM state

On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 10:33 AM Justin Forbes <jmforbes@...uxtx.org> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jul 17, 2021 at 5:33 PM Moritz Fischer <mdf@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Justin,
> >
> > On Sat, Jul 17, 2021 at 08:39:19AM -0500, Justin Forbes wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 2:31 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > > <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > From: Moritz Fischer <mdf@...nel.org>
> > > >
> > > > commit d143825baf15f204dac60acdf95e428182aa3374 upstream.
> > > >
> > > > The ROM load sometimes seems to return an unknown status
> > > > (RENESAS_ROM_STATUS_NO_RESULT) instead of success / fail.
> > > >
> > > > If the ROM load indeed failed this leads to failures when trying to
> > > > communicate with the controller later on.
> > > >
> > > > Attempt to load firmware using RAM load in those cases.
> > > >
> > > > Fixes: 2478be82de44 ("usb: renesas-xhci: Add ROM loader for uPD720201")
> > > > Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> > > > Cc: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...el.com>
> > > > Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> > > > Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
> > > > Tested-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Moritz Fischer <mdf@...nel.org>
> > > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210615153758.253572-1-mdf@kernel.org
> > > > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> > > >
> > >
> > > After sending out 5.12.17 for testing, we had a user complain that all
> > > of their USB devices disappeared with the error:
> > >
> > > Jul 15 23:18:53 kernel: xhci_hcd 0000:04:00.0: Direct firmware load
> > > for renesas_usb_fw.mem failed with error -2
> > > Jul 15 23:18:53 kernel: xhci_hcd 0000:04:00.0: request_firmware failed: -2
> > > Jul 15 23:18:53 kernel: xhci_hcd: probe of 0000:04:00.0 failed with error -2
> >
> > This looks like it fails finding the actual firmware file (ENOENT). Any
> > chance you could give this a whirl on top of the original patch?
> >
>
> Sure. test kernel building now, will let you know when the user reports back.

The original user reports success with this patch on top of the original patch.

Justin

>
> Justin
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c
> > index 18c2bbddf080..cde8f6f1ec5d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c
> > @@ -379,7 +379,11 @@ static int xhci_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *dev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
> >         driver_data = (struct xhci_driver_data *)id->driver_data;
> >         if (driver_data && driver_data->quirks & XHCI_RENESAS_FW_QUIRK) {
> >                 retval = renesas_xhci_check_request_fw(dev, id);
> > -               if (retval)
> > +               /*
> > +                * If firmware wasn't found there's still a chance this might work without
> > +                * loading firmware on some systems, so let's try at least.
> > +                */
> > +               if (retval && retval != -ENOENT)
> >                         return retval;
> >         }
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Moritz