[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DM6PR21MB15138B5D5C8647C92EA6AB99CEE29@DM6PR21MB1513.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 07:05:37 +0000
From: Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
CC: "longli@...uxonhyperv.com" <longli@...uxonhyperv.com>,
"linux-fs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fs@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: RE: [Patch v4 0/3] Introduce a driver to support host accelerated
access to Microsoft Azure Blob
> Subject: Re: [Patch v4 0/3] Introduce a driver to support host accelerated
> access to Microsoft Azure Blob
>
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 09:37:56PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > such that this object storage driver can be implemented as a
> > user-space library instead of as a kernel driver? As you may know vfio
> > users can either use eventfds for completion notifications or polling.
> > An interface like io_uring can be built easily on top of vfio.
>
> Yes. Similar to say the NVMe K/V command set this does not look like a
> candidate for a kernel driver.
The driver is modeled to support multiple processes/users over a VMBUS
channel. I don't see a way that this can be implemented through VFIO?
Even if it can be done, this exposes a security risk as the same VMBUS
channel is shared by multiple processes in user-mode.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists