[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210720084912.GB8089@willie-the-truck>
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 09:49:12 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Claire Chang <tientzu@...omium.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] swiotlb: Point io_default_tlb_mem at static
allocation
On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 09:51:12AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> I'd prefer if the next patch is merged into this one, to avoid the
> confusing state inbetween entirely.
Of course. For some reason, I half thought this patch would need to go to
stable, but the restricted DMA stuff didn't land so there's no backporting
to worry about.
I'll merge 'em for v2.
Thanks for having a look!
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists