[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DM8PR11MB56699B74F47AF7EFB4FB997389E29@DM8PR11MB5669.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 12:13:37 +0000
From: "Zhuo, Qiuxu" <qiuxu.zhuo@...el.com>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>,
Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <nchatrad@....com>
CC: "linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"mchehab@...nel.org" <mchehab@...nel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/7] EDAC/mc: Add new HBM2 memory type
> From: Luck, Tony <tony.luck@...el.com>
> ...
> That commit makes the normal vs. HBM error visible in the DIMM label (by
> prefixing the "MC" for memory controller with "HB".
>
> + if (imc->hbm_mc)
> + snprintf(dimm->label, sizeof(dimm->label),
> "CPU_SrcID#%u_HBMC#%u_Chan#%u",
> + imc->src_id, imc->lmc, chan);
> + else
> + snprintf(dimm->label, sizeof(dimm->label),
> "CPU_SrcID#%u_MC#%u_Chan#%u_DIMM#%u",
> + imc->src_id, imc->lmc, chan, dimmno);
>
> Perhaps we should also set the "type" of the DIMMs. Qiuxu: opinion?
Yes, we should. I'll make a patch for it.
Thanks!
-Qiuxu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists