[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YPbAEbcOzBrK2KfB@matsya>
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 17:52:41 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To: Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Robin Gong <yibin.gong@....com>, broonie@...nel.org,
shawnguo@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-imx@....com, kernel@...gutronix.de,
dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
mark.rutland@....com, robh+dt@...nel.org, catalin.marinas@....com,
will.deacon@....com, festevam@...il.com, s.hauer@...gutronix.de,
martin.fuzzey@...wbird.group, u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de,
dan.j.williams@...el.com, matthias.schiffer@...tq-group.com,
frieder.schrempf@...tron.de, m.felsch@...gutronix.de,
xiaoning.wang@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 00/12] add ecspi ERR009165 for i.mx6/7 soc family
On 14-07-21, 11:05, Lucas Stach wrote:
> Hi Vinod, Mark, Shawn,
>
> with this revision I think this series is ready to be picked up, at
> least I couldn't spot any blockers anymore.
>
> How would you like to deal with this? While the complete series is
> needed to fix the issues and restore proper DMA functionality on
> unaffected SoCs, there are no dependencies between the patches
> targeting different subsystems.
> Do you prefer to pick dma/spi/dt patches from this series in your
> respective trees, or do you want the whole series to go through the imx
> tree? AFAICS all dma and spi patches are already acked, so taking them
> through one tree would be possible, I think.
Sure, since you have acks, feel free to merge thru imx6 tree
--
~Vinod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists