[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YPbABBSTkN+xNY0w@chrisdown.name>
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 13:22:28 +0100
From: Chris Down <chris@...isdown.name>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the printk tree
Chris Down writes:
>+Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Well, let's actually Cc them this time...
>Stephen Rothwell writes:
>>After merging the printk tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs)
>>produced this warning:
>>
>>kernel/printk/printk.c:1: warning: 'printk' not found
>>
>>Introduced by commit
>>
>> 337015573718 ("printk: Userspace format indexing support")
>>
>>I presume that "printk" is referred to elsewhere in the documentation
>>as being in this file.
>
>Hmm, this is an interesting one, because I think we still generally
>just want to refer to the API as being `printk()`. Changing it all
>over the place seems wrong. As you'd imagine, there are quite a few
>references to this name, so it requires a lot of noise all over the
>docs and inline comments.
>
>Jonathan and other docs folks, how can one tell Sphinx that when it
>sees printk() it's referring to a function-like macro, or otherwise
>squelch this reasonably? :-)
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (964 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists