linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] mfd: tps65086: Make interrupt line optional

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANBLGcx08XajR8khJmKARBjy7bQ5ebbgO+RRqRu=bvyMx7LuKA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 20 Jul 2021 17:36:43 +0200
From:   Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@...il.dk>
To:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] mfd: tps65086: Make interrupt line optional

On Tue, 20 Jul 2021 at 17:32, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Jul 2021, Emil Renner Berthing wrote:
> > On Tue, 20 Jul 2021 at 17:07, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
> > > On Sat, 26 Jun 2021, Emil Renner Berthing wrote:
> > > > The BeagleV Starlight v0.9 board[1] doesn't have the IRQB line routed to
> > > > the SoC, but it is still useful to be able to reach the PMIC over I2C
> > > > for the other functionality it provides.
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://github.com/beagleboard/beaglev-starlight
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@...il.dk>
> > > > ---
> > > >  .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,tps65086.yaml  |  3 ---
> > >
> > > This is not present in my current tree.
> > >
> > > Looks like it's still *.txt.
> > >
> > > Am I missing a patch?
> >
> > Yes, the first patch in the series converts that to yaml. I'm quite
> > sure I had the same list of recipients on all 4 mails in the series,
> > so don't know why that should be missing.
>
> Oh, it's not marked as 'important' because it has open review comments
> on it.
>
> Just have this for now then:
>
> For my own reference (apply this as-is to your sign-off block):
>
>   Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>

Thanks! Do you want to have a look at 3/3 or should I just send a v2
to fix the yaml conversion now?

/Emil