[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YPbxS4KV+Fx01p7G@yoga>
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 10:52:43 -0500
From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
To: Tang Bin <tangbin@...s.chinamobile.com>
Cc: agross@...nel.org, sre@...nel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Zhang Shengju <zhangshengju@...s.chinamobile.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] power: supply: qcom_smbb: Remove superfluous error
message
On Tue 20 Jul 09:15 CDT 2021, Tang Bin wrote:
> In the probe function, when get irq failed, the function
> platform_get_irq_byname() logs an error message, so remove
> redundant message here.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Shengju <zhangshengju@...s.chinamobile.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tang Bin <tangbin@...s.chinamobile.com>
This says "Zhang certified this patch's origin, then you took the patch
and you certified it's origin" - per Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
But you, Tang, is the author or the patch, so how can Zhang have touched
it before you wrote it?
Perhaps you worked on it together? In which case you should include a
Co-developed-by to indicate this.
Both commit message and patch looks good though!
Regards,
Bjorn
> ---
> drivers/power/supply/qcom_smbb.c | 5 +----
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/power/supply/qcom_smbb.c b/drivers/power/supply/qcom_smbb.c
> index c890e1cec..84cc9fba0 100644
> --- a/drivers/power/supply/qcom_smbb.c
> +++ b/drivers/power/supply/qcom_smbb.c
> @@ -929,11 +929,8 @@ static int smbb_charger_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> int irq;
>
> irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, smbb_charger_irqs[i].name);
> - if (irq < 0) {
> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get irq '%s'\n",
> - smbb_charger_irqs[i].name);
> + if (irq < 0)
> return irq;
> - }
>
> smbb_charger_irqs[i].handler(irq, chg);
>
> --
> 2.20.1.windows.1
>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists