[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YPb50VHKYrnmDkyK@google.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 17:29:05 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@...il.dk>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] mfd: tps65086: Make interrupt line optional
On Tue, 20 Jul 2021, Emil Renner Berthing wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Jul 2021 at 18:07, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, 20 Jul 2021, Emil Renner Berthing wrote:
> > > On Tue, 20 Jul 2021 at 17:32, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 20 Jul 2021, Emil Renner Berthing wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, 20 Jul 2021 at 17:07, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
> > > > > > On Sat, 26 Jun 2021, Emil Renner Berthing wrote:
> > > > > > > The BeagleV Starlight v0.9 board[1] doesn't have the IRQB line routed to
> > > > > > > the SoC, but it is still useful to be able to reach the PMIC over I2C
> > > > > > > for the other functionality it provides.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [1] https://github.com/beagleboard/beaglev-starlight
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@...il.dk>
> > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,tps65086.yaml | 3 ---
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This is not present in my current tree.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Looks like it's still *.txt.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Am I missing a patch?
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes, the first patch in the series converts that to yaml. I'm quite
> > > > > sure I had the same list of recipients on all 4 mails in the series,
> > > > > so don't know why that should be missing.
> > > >
> > > > Oh, it's not marked as 'important' because it has open review comments
> > > > on it.
> > > >
> > > > Just have this for now then:
> > > >
> > > > For my own reference (apply this as-is to your sign-off block):
> > > >
> > > > Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
> > >
> > > Thanks! Do you want to have a look at 3/3 or should I just send a v2
> > > to fix the yaml conversion now?
> >
> > Patch 3 should be split.
>
> Oh, how split? Split off the series or split into adding the "driver"
> and then add the cell to the parent?
I'm not overly concerned about the ordering.
Just split out the patch per-subsystem.
> > I think it should also s/restart/reset/.
>
> Oh right yes. You mean the cell name needs to be .name =
> "tps65086-reset", right?
Right.
> I'll fix that anyway.
Ta.
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists