linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] dt-bindings: Add binding for Renesas 8T49N241

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 20 Jul 2021 09:58:10 -0700
From:   Alex Helms <alexander.helms.jy@...esas.com>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     robh+dt@...nel.org, geert+renesas@...der.be,
        mturquette@...libre.com, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        david.cater.jc@...esas.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sboyd@...nel.org,
        michal.simek@...inx.com, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] dt-bindings: Add binding for Renesas 8T49N241

On 7/19/2021 3:48 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Jul 2021 11:20:00 -0700, Alex Helms wrote:
>> Renesas 8T49N241 has 4 outputs, 1 integral and 3 fractional dividers.
>> The 8T49N241 accepts up to two differential or single-ended input clocks
>> and a fundamental-mode crystal input. The internal PLL can lock to either
>> of the input reference clocks or to the crystal to behave as a frequency
>> synthesizer.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alex Helms <alexander.helms.jy@...esas.com>
>> ---
>>  .../bindings/clock/renesas,8t49n241.yaml      | 190 ++++++++++++++++++
>>  MAINTAINERS                                   |   6 +
>>  2 files changed, 196 insertions(+)
>>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/renesas,8t49n241.yaml
>>
> 
> 
> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
> there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
> maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.
> 
> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
> 

Thank you for the info. I'm new to the kernel process and appreciate your advice.

I felt uncomfortable adding your Reviewed-By tag but since there were no changes to the dt
portion of the patch, in retrospect I guess I should have added it. I'll keep this in mind
for the future. Is there anything I need to do for this patch?