lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3d4168e0f7e62a31a00b3a16d155224842442dd8.camel@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 21 Jul 2021 15:19:00 -0500
From:   Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...nel.org>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] tracing/histogram: Rename "cpu" to "common_cpu"

Hi Steve,

On Wed, 2021-07-21 at 11:00 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> 
> Currently the histogram logic allows the user to write "cpu" in as an
> event field, and it will record the CPU that the event happened on.
> 
> The problem with this is that there's a lot of events that have "cpu"
> as a real field, and using "cpu" as the CPU it ran on, makes it
> impossible to run histograms on the "cpu" field of events.
> 

Yes, you're absolutely right, it should have been named "common_cpu"
from the start, not only for this reason but also just for the sake of
consistency.

Reviewed-by: Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...nel.org>


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ