linux-kernel - [PATCH rcu 17/18] rcu: Explain why rcu_all_qs() is a stub in preemptible TREE RCU

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210721202127.2129660-17-paulmck@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 21 Jul 2021 13:21:25 -0700
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To:     rcu@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com, mingo@...nel.org,
        jiangshanlai@...il.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, josh@...htriplett.org,
        tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
        dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
        oleg@...hat.com, joel@...lfernandes.org,
        Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
        Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@...eaurora.org>,
        Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
        "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH rcu 17/18] rcu: Explain why rcu_all_qs() is a stub in preemptible TREE RCU

From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>

The cond_resched() function reports an RCU quiescent state only in
non-preemptible TREE RCU implementation.  This commit therefore adds a
comment explaining why cond_resched() does nothing in preemptible kernels.

Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Cc: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
Cc: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
---
 kernel/sched/core.c | 11 +++++++++++
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 2d9ff40f46619..6a03c3fac55cc 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -7781,6 +7781,17 @@ int __sched __cond_resched(void)
 		preempt_schedule_common();
 		return 1;
 	}
+	/*
+	 * In preemptible kernels, ->rcu_read_lock_nesting tells the tick
+	 * whether the current CPU is in an RCU read-side critical section,
+	 * so the tick can report quiescent states even for CPUs looping
+	 * in kernel context.  In contrast, in non-preemptible kernels,
+	 * RCU readers leave no in-memory hints, which means that CPU-bound
+	 * processes executing in kernel context might never report an
+	 * RCU quiescent state.  Therefore, the following code causes
+	 * cond_resched() to report a quiescent state, but only when RCU
+	 * is in urgent need of one.
+	 */
 #ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU
 	rcu_all_qs();
 #endif
-- 
2.31.1.189.g2e36527f23