lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 13:21:25 -0700 From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org> To: rcu@...r.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com, mingo@...nel.org, jiangshanlai@...il.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, josh@...htriplett.org, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com, fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com, joel@...lfernandes.org, Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>, Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@...eaurora.org>, Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org> Subject: [PATCH rcu 17/18] rcu: Explain why rcu_all_qs() is a stub in preemptible TREE RCU From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org> The cond_resched() function reports an RCU quiescent state only in non-preemptible TREE RCU implementation. This commit therefore adds a comment explaining why cond_resched() does nothing in preemptible kernels. Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org> Cc: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@...eaurora.org> Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org> Cc: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com> Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org> --- kernel/sched/core.c | 11 +++++++++++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c index 2d9ff40f46619..6a03c3fac55cc 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/core.c +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c @@ -7781,6 +7781,17 @@ int __sched __cond_resched(void) preempt_schedule_common(); return 1; } + /* + * In preemptible kernels, ->rcu_read_lock_nesting tells the tick + * whether the current CPU is in an RCU read-side critical section, + * so the tick can report quiescent states even for CPUs looping + * in kernel context. In contrast, in non-preemptible kernels, + * RCU readers leave no in-memory hints, which means that CPU-bound + * processes executing in kernel context might never report an + * RCU quiescent state. Therefore, the following code causes + * cond_resched() to report a quiescent state, but only when RCU + * is in urgent need of one. + */ #ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU rcu_all_qs(); #endif -- 2.31.1.189.g2e36527f23
Powered by blists - more mailing lists