[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210721210441.796995-2-paulmck@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 14:04:36 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To: rcu@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com, mingo@...nel.org,
jiangshanlai@...il.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, josh@...htriplett.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
oleg@...hat.com, joel@...lfernandes.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH rcu 2/7] rcutorture: Preempt rather than block when testing task stalls
Currently, rcu_torture_stall() does a one-jiffy timed wait when
stall_cpu_block is set. This works, but emits a pointless splat in
CONFIG_PREEMPT=y kernels. This commit avoids this splat by instead
invoking preempt_schedule() in CONFIG_PREEMPT=y kernels.
This uses an admittedly ugly #ifdef, but abstracted approaches just
looked worse. A prettier approach would provide a preempt_schedule()
definition with a WARN_ON() for CONFIG_PREEMPT=n kernels, but this seems
quite silly.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
---
kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c b/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
index 40ef5417d9545..ab4215266ebee 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
@@ -2022,8 +2022,13 @@ static int rcu_torture_stall(void *args)
__func__, raw_smp_processor_id());
while (ULONG_CMP_LT((unsigned long)ktime_get_seconds(),
stop_at))
- if (stall_cpu_block)
+ if (stall_cpu_block) {
+#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPTION
+ preempt_schedule();
+#else
schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(HZ);
+#endif
+ }
if (stall_cpu_irqsoff)
local_irq_enable();
else if (!stall_cpu_block)
--
2.31.1.189.g2e36527f23
Powered by blists - more mailing lists