linux-kernel - Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: change fiemap way in printing compression chunk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 21 Jul 2021 14:35:43 -0700
From:   Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
To:     Daeho Jeong <daeho43@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, kernel-team@...roid.com,
        Daeho Jeong <daehojeong@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: change fiemap way in printing
 compression chunk

On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 12:20:48AM -0700, Daeho Jeong wrote:
> From: Daeho Jeong <daehojeong@...gle.com>
> 
> When we print out a discontinuous compression chunk, it shows like a
> continuous chunk now. To show it more correctly, I've changed the way of
> printing fiemap info like below. Plus, eliminated NEW_ADDR(-1) in fiemap
> info, since it is not in fiemap user api manual.
> 
> 0: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000001000 1008 (M/E)
> 1: 0000000000001000 0000000f15c0f000 0000000000001000 1008 (M/E)
> 2: 0000000000002000 0000000000000000 0000000000002000 1808 (M/U/E)
> 3: 0000000000004000 0000000000000000 0000000000001000 1008 (M/E)
> 4: 0000000000005000 0000000f15c10000 0000000000001000 1008 (M/E)
> 5: 0000000000006000 0000000000000000 0000000000002000 1808 (M/U/E)
> 6: 0000000000008000 0000000000000000 0000000000001000 1008 (M/E)

Please label these columns.

Anyway, this doesn't appear to work quite in the way I had in mind.  With this
patch, what I'm seeing is:

$ head -c 16384 /dev/zero > file; xfs_io -c "fiemap -v" file
file:
 EXT: FILE-OFFSET      BLOCK-RANGE      TOTAL FLAGS
   0: [0..7]:          0..7                 8 0x1008
   1: [8..15]:         2683128..2683135     8 0x1008
   2: [16..31]:        0..15               16 0x1809

So, working in 512-byte sectors, the logical sectors 0-31 are stored as one
compressed cluster in the 8 physical sectors 2683128-2683135.

The problem is, with this patch these physical sectors are reported at logical
sectors 8-15 instead of 0-7.  Obviously, this isn't particularly well-defined,
but I thought it was logical for the physical blocks to be associated with the
first logical blocks.  That is what the tests I've written (xfstest f2fs/002,
and the Android vts_kernel_encryption_test) assume.

Is there any particular reason why you wouldn't report instead:

   0: [0..7]:         2683128..2683135     8 0x1008
   1: [8..31]:        0..23                8 0x1809

- Eric