[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YPfCnIfVmolgfMPF@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 07:45:48 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
Mark Zhang <markz@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next 4/7] RDMA/core: Reorganize create QP low-level
functions
> +/**
> + * ib_create_qp_kernel - Creates a kernel QP associated with the specified
Any reason this function is renamed? This seems rather unrelated to
the rest of th patch.
> + * protection domain.
> * @pd: The protection domain associated with the QP.
> * @qp_init_attr: A list of initial attributes required to create the
> * QP. If QP creation succeeds, then the attributes are updated to
> * the actual capabilities of the created QP.
> * @caller: caller's build-time module name
> - *
> - * NOTE: for user qp use ib_create_qp_user with valid udata!
> */
Also a kerneldoc comment for a function that is an implementation
detail is actively harmful. Please document ib_create_qp instead.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists