[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YPfFn2Qlaoe5cwBX@unreal>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 09:58:39 +0300
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, Mark Zhang <markz@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next 4/7] RDMA/core: Reorganize create QP low-level
functions
On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 07:45:48AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > +/**
> > + * ib_create_qp_kernel - Creates a kernel QP associated with the specified
>
> Any reason this function is renamed? This seems rather unrelated to
> the rest of th patch.
I wanted to make two functions: ib_create_qp_kernel and ib_create_qp_user.
>
> > + * protection domain.
> > * @pd: The protection domain associated with the QP.
> > * @qp_init_attr: A list of initial attributes required to create the
> > * QP. If QP creation succeeds, then the attributes are updated to
> > * the actual capabilities of the created QP.
> > * @caller: caller's build-time module name
> > - *
> > - * NOTE: for user qp use ib_create_qp_user with valid udata!
> > */
>
> Also a kerneldoc comment for a function that is an implementation
> detail is actively harmful. Please document ib_create_qp instead.
Sure, will do.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists