[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YPfK0VHovcc45heP@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 08:20:49 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, Mark Zhang <markz@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next 7/7] RDMA/core: Create clean QP creations
interface for uverbs
On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 08:12:35AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 10:06:06AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > You will need to add some sort of "if qp tpye" for ib_create_qp_uverbs() callers,
> > because they always provide udata != NULL.
> >
> > After this series, the callers look like this:
> >
> > 1438 qp = ib_create_qp_uverbs(device, pd, &attr, &attrs->driver_udata, obj);
> > ^^^^^^^^^ not NULL
> >
> > So instead of bothering callers, I implemented it here with one "if".
>
> Sorry if my mail was confusing. I don't want it in the callers, I
> want it as deep down in the stack as possible instead of having the
> strange wrapper.
In fact ib_create_qp_user already sets udata to NULL for IB_QPT_XRC_TGT,
and _ib_create_qp/create_qp ignores the caller if the udata is NULL.
So I think you can just remove the wrapper and we're already fine.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists