linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH rdma-next 7/7] RDMA/core: Create clean QP creations interface for uverbs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 21 Jul 2021 10:31:08 +0300
From:   Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:     Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, Mark Zhang <markz@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next 7/7] RDMA/core: Create clean QP creations
 interface for uverbs

On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 08:20:49AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 08:12:35AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 10:06:06AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > You will need to add some sort of "if qp tpye" for ib_create_qp_uverbs() callers,
> > > because they always provide udata != NULL. 
> > > 
> > > After this series, the callers look like this:
> > > 
> > >  1438         qp = ib_create_qp_uverbs(device, pd, &attr, &attrs->driver_udata, obj);
> > >                                                           ^^^^^^^^^ not NULL
> > > 
> > > So instead of bothering callers, I implemented it here with one "if".
> > 
> > Sorry if my mail was confusing.  I don't want it in the callers, I
> > want it as deep down in the stack as possible instead of having the
> > strange wrapper.
> 
> In fact ib_create_qp_user already sets udata to NULL for IB_QPT_XRC_TGT,
> and _ib_create_qp/create_qp ignores the caller if the udata is NULL.
> So I think you can just remove the wrapper and we're already fine.

Yeah, thanks