linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Update for VMCI driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YPfiNuKonyTIKcDL@kroah.com>
Date:   Wed, 21 Jul 2021 11:00:38 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Jorgen Hansen <jhansen@...are.com>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org" 
        <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        Pv-drivers <Pv-drivers@...are.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Update for VMCI driver

On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 08:46:15AM +0000, Jorgen Hansen wrote:
> 
> 
> > On 20 Jul 2021, at 12:39, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > 
> > On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 03:29:01AM -0700, Jorgen Hansen wrote:
> >> Add maintainer info for the VMware VMCI driver.
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Jorgen Hansen <jhansen@...are.com>
> >> ---
> >> MAINTAINERS | 8 ++++++++
> >> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> >> 
> >> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> >> index a61f4f3..7e7c6fa 100644
> >> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> >> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> >> @@ -19792,6 +19792,14 @@ L:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
> >> S:	Supported
> >> F:	drivers/ptp/ptp_vmw.c
> >> 
> >> +VMWARE VMCI DRIVER
> >> +M:	Jorgen Hansen <jhansen@...are.com>
> >> +M:	Vishnu Dasa <vdasa@...are.com>
> >> +M:	"VMware, Inc." <pv-drivers@...are.com>
> > 
> > Please do not use generic aliases as they provide no personal
> > responsibility.  Just stick with real people.
> 
> That makes sense. However, the pv-drivers list is used for keeping managers
> and people helping with testing in the loop. So would adding pv-drivers as a
> second L: entry be OK?

Is it really a list?  If not, then that would not make much sense.