linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.9 17/18] scsi: be2iscsi: Fix some missing space in some messages

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YPf6KXaz+LLnC0vi@sashalap>
Date:   Wed, 21 Jul 2021 06:42:49 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     Marion & Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
        Kernel Janitors <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.9 17/18] scsi: be2iscsi: Fix some missing space
 in some messages

On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 09:22:43PM +0200, Marion & Christophe JAILLET wrote:
>
>Le 14/07/2021 à 21:48, Sasha Levin a écrit :
>>From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
>>
>>[ Upstream commit c7fa2c855e892721bafafdf6393342c000e0ef77 ]
>>
>>Fix a few style issues reported by checkpatch.pl:
>>
>>  - Avoid duplicated word in comment.
>>
>>  - Add missing space in messages.
>>
>>  - Unneeded continuation line character.
>>
>>  - Unneeded extra spaces.
>>
>>  - Unneeded log message after memory allocation failure.
>>
>>Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/8cb62f0eb96ec7ce7a73fe97cb4490dd5121ecff.1623482155.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr
>>Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
>>Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
>>Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
>
>Hi,
>
>I always appreciate to have some patches backported, but in this 
>particular case, I wonder what is the rational to backport up to 4.9 
>some checkpatch warning about log message?
>
>Keeping code aligned to ease other future backport?
>
>I thought that the rule for backport was that it needed to fix a real 
>issue (and sometimes a real 'potential' issue)

I think that I brought it in as a dependency for something else, but I
don't see what it was. I'll drop it then, thanks!

-- 
Thanks,
Sasha