[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210721022442.159436-1-bholman.devel@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 20:24:41 -0600
From: Brett Holman <bholman.devel@...il.com>
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc: linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] perf mem: Standardize \'perf mem\' arg parsing
This is my first time contributing here, please let me know if I
missed anything.
To compare the commands tested, use the following:
strace -f ./perf record foo -pv bar 2>&1 | grep -a execve
strace -f ./perf mem record foo -pv bar 2>&1 | grep -a execve
Before this patch, note that '-pv' is stripped out of the command under
test for 'perf mem record', but not for 'perf record'. This patch makes
the behaviors match.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists