[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210721122131.dlmkv7jsk2exj22y@pathway.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 14:21:31 +0200
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To: John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH printk v4 5/6] printk: convert @syslog_lock to mutex
On Thu 2021-07-15 21:39:58, John Ogness wrote:
> @syslog_lock was a raw_spin_lock to simplify the transition of
> removing @logbuf_lock and the safe buffers. With that transition
> complete, and since all uses of @syslog_lock are within sleepable
> contexts, @syslog_lock can become a mutex.
>
> Note that until now register_console() would disable interrupts
> using irqsave, which implies that it may be called with interrupts
> disabled. And indeed, there is one possible call chain on parisc
> where this happens:
>
> handle_interruption(code=1) /* High-priority machine check (HPMC) */
> pdc_console_restart()
> pdc_console_init_force()
> register_console()
>
> However, register_console() calls console_lock(), which might sleep.
> So it has never been allowed to call register_console() from an
> atomic context and the above call chain is a bug.
>
> Note that the removal of read_syslog_seq_irq() is slightly changing
> the behavior of SYSLOG_ACTION_READ by testing against a possibly
> outdated @seq value. However, the value of @seq could have changed
> after the test, so it is not a new window. A follow-up commit closes
> this window.
>
> Signed-off-by: John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Best Regards,
Petr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists