lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 21 Jul 2021 16:22:33 +0200
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc:     dillon min <dillon.minfei@...il.com>,
        "thierry.reding@...il.com" <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
        Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
        Noralf Trønnes <noralf@...nnes.org>,
        Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "open list:DRM PANEL DRIVERS" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: display: panel: Add ilitek ili9341
 panel bindings

On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 4:18 PM Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org> wrote:
> Hi Linus,
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 04:00:35PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 9:41 AM <dillon.minfei@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > > From: Dillon Min <dillon.minfei@...il.com>
> > >
> > > Add documentation for "ilitek,ili9341" panel.
> > >
> > > Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Dillon Min <dillon.minfei@...il.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
>
> will you take care to push the patches now you did the review?

Yes but uncertain about patch 2/3 which fixes a DTS file.

Normally that should go through the SoC tree. I'm fine with
applying 1 & 3 but don't want to cause excess errors in schema
validation so I'm a bit ambivalent.

I would prefer if patch 2 gets applied to the SoC tree and
propagate all the way to linux-next before applying patch 1 & 3
but I understand that will take some time.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ