[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c0f191cc-6400-7309-e8a4-eab0925a3d54@universe-factory.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 17:28:21 +0200
From: Matthias Schiffer <mschiffer@...verse-factory.net>
To: Moritz Fischer <mdf@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gabriel.kh.huang@...-na.com,
moritzf@...gle.com, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...el.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Justin Forbes <jmforbes@...uxtx.org>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "usb: renesas-xhci: Fix handling of unknown ROM
state"
On 7/19/21 9:05 AM, Moritz Fischer wrote:
> This reverts commit d143825baf15f204dac60acdf95e428182aa3374.
>
> Justin reports some of his systems now fail as result of this commit:
>
> xhci_hcd 0000:04:00.0: Direct firmware load for renesas_usb_fw.mem failed with error -2
> xhci_hcd 0000:04:00.0: request_firmware failed: -2
> xhci_hcd: probe of 0000:04:00.0 failed with error -2
>
> The revert brings back the original issue the commit tried to solve but
> at least unbreaks existing systems relying on previous behavior.
>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...el.com>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
> Cc: Justin Forbes <jmforbes@...uxtx.org>
> Reported-by: Justin Forbes <jmforbes@...uxtx.org>
> Signed-off-by: Moritz Fischer <mdf@...nel.org>
> ---
>
> Justin,
>
> would you be able to help out testing follow up patches to this?
>
> I don't have a machine to test your use-case and mine definitly requires
> a firmware load on RENESAS_ROM_STATUS_NO_RESULT.
>
> Thanks
> - Moritz
Hi Moritz,
as an additional data point, here's the behaviour of my system, a Thinkpad
T14 AMD with:
06:00.0 USB controller [0c03]: Renesas Technology Corp. uPD720202 USB 3.0
Host Controller [1912:0015] (rev 02)
- On Kernel 5.13.1, no firmware: USB controller resets in an endless loop
when the system is running from battery
- On Kernel 5.13.4, no firmware: USB controller probe fails with the
mentioned firmware load error
- On Kernel 5.13.4, with renesas_usb_fw.mem: everything is working fine,
the reset issue is gone
So it seems to me that requiring a firmware is generally the correct driver
behaviour for this hardware. The firmware I found in the Arch User
Repository [1] unfortunately has a very restrictive license...
Kind regards,
Matthias
[1] https://github.com/denisandroid/uPD72020x-Firmware
>
> ---
> drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci-renesas.c | 16 ++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci-renesas.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci-renesas.c
> index 1da647961c25..5923844ed821 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci-renesas.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci-renesas.c
> @@ -207,8 +207,7 @@ static int renesas_check_rom_state(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> return 0;
>
> case RENESAS_ROM_STATUS_NO_RESULT: /* No result yet */
> - dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "Unknown ROM status ...\n");
> - break;
> + return 0;
>
> case RENESAS_ROM_STATUS_ERROR: /* Error State */
> default: /* All other states are marked as "Reserved states" */
> @@ -225,12 +224,13 @@ static int renesas_fw_check_running(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> u8 fw_state;
> int err;
>
> - /*
> - * Only if device has ROM and loaded FW we can skip loading and
> - * return success. Otherwise (even unknown state), attempt to load FW.
> - */
> - if (renesas_check_rom(pdev) && !renesas_check_rom_state(pdev))
> - return 0;
> + /* Check if device has ROM and loaded, if so skip everything */
> + err = renesas_check_rom(pdev);
> + if (err) { /* we have rom */
> + err = renesas_check_rom_state(pdev);
> + if (!err)
> + return err;
> + }
>
> /*
> * Test if the device is actually needing the firmware. As most
>
Download attachment "OpenPGP_signature" of type "application/pgp-signature" (841 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists