[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c4549652-ab18-7b69-c684-b25ecab223bf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 19:00:45 +0300
From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 24/37] soc/tegra: fuse: Enable fuse clock on suspend
02.07.2021 02:27, Dmitry Osipenko пишет:
> +static int __maybe_unused tegra_fuse_resume(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + int err;
> +
> + /*
> + * Critical for RAM re-repair operation, which must occur on resume
> + * from LP1 system suspend and as part of CCPLEX cluster switching.
> + */
> + if (fuse->soc->clk_suspend_on) {
> + err = pm_runtime_force_resume(dev);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int __maybe_unused tegra_fuse_suspend(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + int err;
> +
> + if (fuse->soc->clk_suspend_on) {
> + err = pm_runtime_force_suspend(dev);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> + }
I just noticed that something gone wrong with this patch, the condition
should have been inverted. I'll fix it in the next version.
I may also try to factor out these fuse and some other patches which
could become a 5.15 material.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists