[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <879d4cda-2ac1-d81b-7f4d-c08261e0aa0c@pengutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 19:02:38 +0200
From: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@...gutronix.de>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>,
James Bottomley <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
kernel <kernel@...gutronix.de>, James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
horia geanta <horia.geanta@....com>,
aymen sghaier <aymen.sghaier@....com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
davem <davem@...emloft.net>, Udit Agarwal <udit.agarwal@....com>,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>,
Jan Luebbe <j.luebbe@...gutronix.de>,
david <david@...ma-star.at>,
Franck Lenormand <franck.lenormand@....com>,
Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>,
"open list, ASYMMETRIC KEYS" <keyrings@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-integrity <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
LSM <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] KEYS: trusted: Introduce support for NXP
CAAM-based trusted keys
Hi,
On 20.07.21 21:19, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 2, 2021 at 2:37 PM Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@...gutronix.de> wrote:
>>> Both is possible. If the string starts with "0x" it needs to be decoded to a
>>> 128 bit key. Otherwise it has to be a up to 16 byte string.
>>
>> Fine by me. Looking forward to your patches. :-)
>
> I'm not sure how to proceed. Should I base my changes on this series
> or do you plan to send an updated
> version soon?
> Maybe it makes also sense to base my DCP patch set on yours.
>
> Trusted Keys maintainers, what do you prefer?
I sent out v3 despite the name (of course forgot that git-send-email -vX is silently
dropped when sending patch files directly..):
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/cover.9fc9298fd9d63553491871d043a18affc2dbc8a8.1626885907.git-series.a.fatoum@pengutronix.de/T/#t
I'd advise you base your changes on the first two patches there as well as the Kconfig fix/enhancement
I sent out separately:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/20210721160258.7024-1-a.fatoum@pengutronix.de/T/#u
Those are relevant for you as well and I assume they should be good to be merged even if the
CAAM series turns out to need some more love.
Cheers,
Ahmad
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Powered by blists - more mailing lists