lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 21 Jul 2021 18:37:23 +0100
From:   Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To:     butt3rflyh4ck <butterflyhuangxx@...il.com>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        syzkaller-bugs <syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: A shift-out-of-bounds in minix_statfs in fs/minix/inode.c

On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 01:14:06AM +0800, butt3rflyh4ck wrote:
> ms = (struct minix_super_block *) bh->b_data; /// --------------> set
> minix_super_block pointer
> sbi->s_ms = ms;
> sbi->s_sbh = bh;
> sbi->s_mount_state = ms->s_state;
> sbi->s_ninodes = ms->s_ninodes;
> sbi->s_nzones = ms->s_nzones;
> sbi->s_imap_blocks = ms->s_imap_blocks;
> sbi->s_zmap_blocks = ms->s_zmap_blocks;
> sbi->s_firstdatazone = ms->s_firstdatazone;
> sbi->s_log_zone_size = ms->s_log_zone_size;  // ------------------>
> set sbi->s_log_zone_size

So what you're saying is that if you construct a malicious minix image,
you can produce undefined behaviour?  That's not something we're
traditionally interested in, unless the filesystem is one customarily
used for data interchange (like FAT or iso9660).

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ