[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <11b5493ecb6118ec8c5fd49ec7a85aa3@codeaurora.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 23:11:35 +0530
From: Sibi Sankar <sibis@...eaurora.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
Cc: bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, mka@...omium.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
saiprakash.ranjan@...eaurora.org, will@...nel.org, ohad@...ery.com,
agross@...nel.org, mathieu.poirier@...aro.org,
robin.murphy@....com, joro@...tes.org, p.zabel@...gutronix.de,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, evgreen@...omium.org,
dianders@...omium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/10] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add nodes to boot
modem
On 2021-07-21 11:14, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Sibi Sankar (2021-07-20 03:12:58)
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
>> index 5ed7a511bfc9..3fb6a6ef39f8 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
>> @@ -1219,6 +1224,21 @@
>> };
>> };
>>
>> + imem@...aa000 {
>
> is sram a more appropriate node name here? Is imem a generic node name
> in DT spec?
binding check for qcom,pil-info.yaml
didn't complain so I just followed
it. AFAICS, sram isn't mentioned in
generic node names either.
>
>> + compatible = "syscon", "simple-mfd";
>> + reg = <0 0x146aa000 0 0x2000>;
>> +
>> + #address-cells = <2>;
>> + #size-cells = <2>;
>> +
>> + ranges = <0 0x0 0 0x146aa000 0 0x2000>;
>> +
>> + pil-reloc@94c {
>> + compatible = "qcom,pil-reloc-info";
>> + reg = <0 0x94c 0 0xc8>;
>> + };
>> + };
>> +
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists