lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210721175432.2119-4-mdtipton@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Wed, 21 Jul 2021 10:54:31 -0700
From:   Mike Tipton <mdtipton@...eaurora.org>
To:     djakov@...nel.org
Cc:     bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, agross@...nel.org,
        saravanak@...gle.com, okukatla@...eaurora.org,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        Mike Tipton <mdtipton@...eaurora.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/4] interconnect: qcom: icc-rpmh: Ensure floor BW is enforced for all nodes

We currently only enforce BW floors for a subset of nodes in a path.
All BCMs that need updating are queued in the pre_aggregate/aggregate
phase. The first set() commits all queued BCMs and subsequent set()
calls short-circuit without committing anything. Since the floor BW
isn't set in sum_avg/max_peak until set(), then some BCMs are committed
before their associated nodes reflect the floor.

Set the floor as each node is being aggregated. This ensures that all
all relevant floors are set before the BCMs are committed.

Fixes: 266cd33b5913 ("interconnect: qcom: Ensure that the floor bandwidth value is enforced")
Signed-off-by: Mike Tipton <mdtipton@...eaurora.org>
---
 drivers/interconnect/qcom/icc-rpmh.c | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/interconnect/qcom/icc-rpmh.c b/drivers/interconnect/qcom/icc-rpmh.c
index bf01d09dba6c..f118f57eae37 100644
--- a/drivers/interconnect/qcom/icc-rpmh.c
+++ b/drivers/interconnect/qcom/icc-rpmh.c
@@ -57,6 +57,11 @@ int qcom_icc_aggregate(struct icc_node *node, u32 tag, u32 avg_bw,
 			qn->sum_avg[i] += avg_bw;
 			qn->max_peak[i] = max_t(u32, qn->max_peak[i], peak_bw);
 		}
+
+		if (node->init_avg || node->init_peak) {
+			qn->sum_avg[i] = max_t(u64, qn->sum_avg[i], node->init_avg);
+			qn->max_peak[i] = max_t(u64, qn->max_peak[i], node->init_peak);
+		}
 	}
 
 	*agg_avg += avg_bw;
@@ -90,11 +95,6 @@ int qcom_icc_set(struct icc_node *src, struct icc_node *dst)
 	qp = to_qcom_provider(node->provider);
 	qn = node->data;
 
-	qn->sum_avg[QCOM_ICC_BUCKET_AMC] = max_t(u64, qn->sum_avg[QCOM_ICC_BUCKET_AMC],
-						 node->avg_bw);
-	qn->max_peak[QCOM_ICC_BUCKET_AMC] = max_t(u64, qn->max_peak[QCOM_ICC_BUCKET_AMC],
-						  node->peak_bw);
-
 	qcom_icc_bcm_voter_commit(qp->voter);
 
 	return 0;
-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ