[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ee98275e-cd1d-ad94-73cd-470bf89ca344@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 11:34:53 -0700
From: "Yu, Yu-cheng" <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
John Allen <john.allen@....com>
CC: <x86@...nel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@...hat.com>,
"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
Vedvyas Shanbhogue <vedvyas.shanbhogue@...el.com>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>,
"Weijiang Yang" <weijiang.yang@...el.com>,
Pengfei Xu <pengfei.xu@...el.com>,
"Haitao Huang" <haitao.huang@...el.com>,
"Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v27 24/31] x86/cet/shstk: Handle thread shadow stack
On 7/21/2021 11:28 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * John Allen:
>
>> At the very least, it would seem that on some systems, it isn't valid to
>> rely on the stack_size passed from clone3, though I'm unsure what the
>> correct behavior should be here. If the passed stack_size == 0 and sp ==
>> 0, is this a case where we want to alloc a shadow stack for this thread
>> with some capped size? Alternatively, is this a case that isn't valid to
>> alloc a shadow stack and we should simply return 0 instead of -EINVAL?
>>
>> I'm running Fedora 34 which satisfies the required versions of gcc,
>> binutils, and glibc.
>
> Fedora 34 doesn't use clone3 yet. You can upgrade to a rawhide build,
> e.g. glibc-2.33.9000-46.fc35:
>
> <https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1782678>
>
> It's currently not in main rawhide because the Firefox sandbox breaks
> clone3. The “fix” is that clone3 will fail with ENOSYS under the
> sandbox.
>
> I expect that container runtimes turn clone3 into clone in the same way
> (via ENOSYS), at least for the medium term. So it would make sense to
> allocate some sort of shadow stack for clone as well, if that's possible
> to implement in some way.
>
> Thanks,
> Florian
>
Thanks Florian! And because of that reason, we will put back clone2
support in my next v28 patches.
Yu-cheng
Powered by blists - more mailing lists