lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 22 Jul 2021 18:32:08 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>,
        Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.13 153/156] firmware: arm_scmi: Avoid padding in sensor message structure

From: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>

commit 187a002b07e8089f0b5657eafec50b5d05625569 upstream.

scmi_resp_sensor_reading_complete structure is meant to represent an
SCMI asynchronous reading complete message. The readings field with
a 64bit type forces padding and breaks reads in scmi_sensor_reading_get.

Split it in two adjacent 32bit readings_low/high subfields to avoid the
padding within the structure. Alternatively we could to mark the structure
packed.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210628170042.34105-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Fixes: e2083d3673916 ("firmware: arm_scmi: Add SCMI v3.0 sensors timestamped reads")
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/sensors.c |    6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/sensors.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/sensors.c
@@ -166,7 +166,8 @@ struct scmi_msg_sensor_reading_get {
 
 struct scmi_resp_sensor_reading_complete {
 	__le32 id;
-	__le64 readings;
+	__le32 readings_low;
+	__le32 readings_high;
 };
 
 struct scmi_sensor_reading_resp {
@@ -717,7 +718,8 @@ static int scmi_sensor_reading_get(const
 
 			resp = t->rx.buf;
 			if (le32_to_cpu(resp->id) == sensor_id)
-				*value = get_unaligned_le64(&resp->readings);
+				*value =
+					get_unaligned_le64(&resp->readings_low);
 			else
 				ret = -EPROTO;
 		}


Powered by blists - more mailing lists