linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] spi: update modalias_show after of_device_uevent

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <162697114030.3066.1118388104811208682.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 22 Jul 2021 18:09:56 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Marco Felsch <m.felsch@...gutronix.de>,
        Andreas Schwab <schwab@...e.de>
Cc:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, kernel@...gutronix.de,
        linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: update modalias_show after of_device_uevent_modalias support

On Thu, 22 Jul 2021 15:48:45 +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Commit 3ce6c9e2617e ("spi: add of_device_uevent_modalias support") is
> incomplete, as it didn't update the modalias_show function to generate the
> of: modalias string if available.

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] spi: update modalias_show after of_device_uevent_modalias support
      commit: e09f2ab8eecc6dcbd7013a1303cbe56b00dc9fb0

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark