[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YPmufPvn9FJXfcip@google.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2021 10:44:28 -0700
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] f2fs: don't sleep while grabing nat_tree_lock
This tries to fix priority inversion in the below condition resulting in
long checkpoint delay.
f2fs_get_node_info()
- nat_tree_lock
-> sleep to grab journal_rwsem by contention
checkpoint
- waiting for nat_tree_lock
In order to let checkpoint go, let's release nat_tree_lock, if there's a
journal_rwsem contention.
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
---
Change log from v1:
- drop rwlock but take retry logic to reduce lock-holding time
fs/f2fs/node.c | 14 ++++++++++----
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
index 0be9e2d7120e..c60ba4179bb2 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
@@ -552,7 +552,7 @@ int f2fs_get_node_info(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid,
int i;
ni->nid = nid;
-
+retry:
/* Check nat cache */
down_read(&nm_i->nat_tree_lock);
e = __lookup_nat_cache(nm_i, nid);
@@ -564,10 +564,16 @@ int f2fs_get_node_info(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid,
return 0;
}
- memset(&ne, 0, sizeof(struct f2fs_nat_entry));
+ /*
+ * Check current segment summary by trying to grab journal_rwsem first.
+ * This sem is on the critical path on the checkpoint requiring the above
+ * nat_tree_lock. Therefore, we should retry, if we failed to grab here.
+ */
+ if (!down_read_trylock(&curseg->journal_rwsem)) {
+ up_read(&nm_i->nat_tree_lock);
+ goto retry;
+ }
- /* Check current segment summary */
- down_read(&curseg->journal_rwsem);
i = f2fs_lookup_journal_in_cursum(journal, NAT_JOURNAL, nid, 0);
if (i >= 0) {
ne = nat_in_journal(journal, i);
--
2.32.0.432.gabb21c7263-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists