[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210722175157.1367122-1-valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2021 18:51:54 +0100
From: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] sched, x86, arm64: PREEMPT_RT, FPU and preemption
Hi folks,
This stems from some more v5.13-rt1 breakage on arm64. This time per-CPU access
safety isn't sufficient, we really need to keep preemption disabled.
In a happy accident I stumbled on
cba08c5dc6dc ("x86/fpu: Make kernel FPU protection RT friendly")
so I packaged what was done there into some common helpers and plastered them
over the problematic areas.
Cheers,
Valentin
Valentin Schneider (3):
sched/preempt: Introduce preempt_{enable, disable}_bh()
x86/fpu: Make FPU protection reuse common helper
arm64/fpsimd: Fix FPSIMD context handling vs PREEMPT_RT
arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c | 6 ++++--
arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/api.h | 19 ++-----------------
include/linux/bottom_half.h | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists