[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <83070b50abe04172b10745584d6b30cb@baidu.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2021 05:22:43 +0000
From: "Li,Rongqing" <lirongqing@...du.com>
To: Mika Penttilä <mika.penttila@...tfour.com>,
"pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: 答复: [PATCH] KVM: Consider SMT idle status when halt polling
> > diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h index
> > ec8d07d..c333218 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> > @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
> > #include <linux/rseq.h>
> > #include <linux/seqlock.h>
> > #include <linux/kcsan.h>
> > +#include <linux/topology.h>
> > #include <asm/kmap_size.h>
> >
> > /* task_struct member predeclarations (sorted alphabetically): */ @@
> > -2191,6 +2192,22 @@ int sched_trace_rq_nr_running(struct rq *rq);
> >
> > const struct cpumask *sched_trace_rd_span(struct root_domain *rd);
> >
> > +static inline bool is_core_idle(int cpu) { #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT
> > + int sibling;
> > +
> > + for_each_cpu(sibling, cpu_smt_mask(cpu)) {
> > + if (cpu == sibling)
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + if (!idle_cpu(cpu))
> > + return false;
>
> if (!idle_cpu(sibling)) instead, now it returns always false.
>
Good Catch. this is history bug.
Do you like to submit by yourself, or I submit on behalf you
Thanks
-Li
Powered by blists - more mailing lists