linux-kernel - Re: Re: [PATCH] kernfs: Convert from atomic_t to refcount_t on kernfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YPkQ8M9CLqeBvN2W@kroah.com>
Date:   Thu, 22 Jul 2021 08:32:16 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Xiyu Yang <19210240158@...an.edu.cn>
Cc:     Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        yuanxzhang@...an.edu.cn, Xin Tan <tanxin.ctf@...il.com>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] kernfs: Convert from atomic_t to refcount_t on
 kernfs_node->count

On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 02:25:18PM +0800, Xiyu Yang wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> I'm not sure why failed... I send it again now.
> 
> I consider it as a reference count due to its related operations and
> the developer's comments, such as "put a reference count on a
> kernfs_node" around the kernfs_put(). 

I'm sorry, but I have no context for this statement, what are you
referring to?

Always properly quote the email you are responding to, so we know what
is happening.  Remember, we deal with thousands of emails a week...

thanks,

greg k-h